Legal Update: Key takeaways from D’Aloia case on crypto fraud victims tracing and claiming against token exchanges

⚡ Key takeaways from D’Aloia case on what crypto fraud victims need to establish to trace and claim against a crypto exchange ⚡

The High Court of England and Wales on 12 Sep 2024 delivered a significant judgment in D’Aloia v Persons Unknown Category A & Ors [2024] EWHC 2342 (Ch).
Continue reading “Legal Update: Key takeaways from D’Aloia case on crypto fraud victims tracing and claiming against token exchanges”

Cryptocurrency and Digital Assets Legal Disputes in Singapore

Overview of Blockchain and Crypto Disputes and Legal Issues and Cases

Our team has subject matter expertise in legal, technical, and economic aspects of blockchain-related matters, including token sales, listings, and issuances, SAFTs, real-world asset tokenisation projects, token exchanges, digital asset and on-chain tracing, crypto-related insolvency, and crypto fraud and scams. As Singapore lawyers, we’ve handled cryptocurrency claims involving persons from different jurisdictions/countries and cross-border elements.

In this article (also accessible at Covenant Chambers’ website), we set out various legal issues, considerations and approaches regarding various types of blockchain and crypto disputes and transactions.

Continue reading “Cryptocurrency and Digital Assets Legal Disputes in Singapore”

Case: Singapore High Court holds that crypto assets are things in action which can be subject to a trust; orders constructive trust over stolen digital assets USDT

ByBit Fintech Ltd v Ho Kai Xin and others [2023] SGHC 199

Significant decision: The General Division of the High Court of Singapore (per curiam Philip Jeyaretnam J) has held that crypto assets are things or choses in action, and thus capable of being subject to a trust.

Continue reading “Case: Singapore High Court holds that crypto assets are things in action which can be subject to a trust; orders constructive trust over stolen digital assets USDT”

Legal and other issues with DAOs (Decentralised Autonomous Organisations)

Legal and other issues with Decentralized Autonomous Organizations or DAOs

In this article, I highlight a few problems with DAOs. The laws make it such that DAOs render members to unlimited liability arising from other members’ actions, DAOs cannot hold property in its own name, DAOs create tax problems for members, DAOs’ voted resolutions may not have legal force, and DAOs may be regulated by investment laws. I consider legal issues with setting up, formation or running of DAOs in Singapore. 

I’ve suggested two variations of a CLG model to address some of the legal issues.

Conceptually, DAOs run into the trust problem and the skill problem.

Continue reading “Legal and other issues with DAOs (Decentralised Autonomous Organisations)”

MAS Consultation on New Omnibus Act for the Financial Sector – Virtual Assets Service Providers & Digital Tokens

Significance: The Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) intends to pass a new omnibus statute to regulate all financial institutions (FIs), including (among others) virtual assets service providers (VASPs) or digital tokens (DT) service provider registered in Singapore but which perform services outside of Singapore.

Continue reading “MAS Consultation on New Omnibus Act for the Financial Sector – Virtual Assets Service Providers & Digital Tokens”

Legislative Update: MAS Payment Services Act and fintech

Significance: new Payment Services Act (“PSA“) by the Monetary Authority of Singapore (“MAS”) was passed by Parliament on 14 January 2019. This new law will replace the Payment Systems (Oversight) Act (Cap. 222A) (“PSOA”) and the Money-Changing and Remittance Businesses Act (Cap. 187) (“MCRBA”).

The proposed new law will apply to:-

a) account issuance service;
b) domestic money transfer service;
c) cross-border money transfer service;
d) merchant acquisition services;
e) e-money issuance service;
f) digital payment token service (cryptocurrencies or virtual currencies);
g) money-changing service.

Continue reading “Legislative Update: MAS Payment Services Act and fintech”

Legislative Update: Market Operators in Singapore – Cryptocurrency and Digital Token Exchanges

Singapore Law; Legal; Lawyer
Updated: Cryptocurrency and digital token exchanges may be market operators or digital payment token exchange Cryptocurrency and digital token exchanges (“Token Exchanges”) which allow the trading and exchange of any token which are “capital markets products”, that is securities, shares, bonds, debentures, units in collective investment schemes, regulated under the SFA would likely be deemed to be market operators: see Case Study 6 of the Guide to Digital Token Offerings issued on 14 November 2017, revised on 30 November 2018 (the “DTO Guide”). Token Exchanges which do not allow trading of any capital markets products regulated under the SFA would not be deemed market operators. However, the Monetary Authority of Singapore (“MAS”) will regulate such exchanges which allow trading of cryptocurrency and digital payment tokens (or virtual currencies) that are not security tokens under a proposed new Payments Services Act (“PSA“): see analysis of the Payment Services Bill here. Operators of Token Exchanges that allow trading of “capital markets products” will need to obtain MAS’s approval, recognition or exemption under the SFA. Operators of Token Exchanges that allow trading of digital payment tokens that are not security tokens or “capital markets products” will need to apply for a licence from MAS under the PSA. Exchanges licensed under the PSA to perform such activities will be required to comply with AML/CFT requirements, including those relating to identification and verification of customer, ongoing monitoring, screening for ML/TF concerns, suspicious transaction reporting and record keeping. More information on this will emerge subsequently. Continue reading “Legislative Update: Market Operators in Singapore – Cryptocurrency and Digital Token Exchanges”