Case Update: Daniel John Brader and others v Commerzbank AG [2013] SGHC 284 – collateral contract, discretionary bonus, employment

Singapore Law; Legal; Lawyer

Daniel John Brader and others v Commerzbank AG [2013] SGHC 284

Significance: Court held that an announcement made to employees at a Townhall meeting regarding bonus payments was held to be a sufficiently certain binding unilateral contract collateral to their employment contracts.

Continue reading “Case Update: Daniel John Brader and others v Commerzbank AG [2013] SGHC 284 – collateral contract, discretionary bonus, employment”

Case Update: Bombay Talkies (S) Pte Ltd v United Overseas Bank Limited [2015] SGCA 66 – compounding debt, statutory demands, winding-up

Singapore Law; Legal; Lawyer

Bombay Talkies (S) Pte Ltd v United Overseas Bank Limited [2015] SGCA 66

Significance: meaning of compounding debt in respect of statutory demands under the companies winding-up regime.

Continue reading “Case Update: Bombay Talkies (S) Pte Ltd v United Overseas Bank Limited [2015] SGCA 66 – compounding debt, statutory demands, winding-up”

Case Update: Boey Pang Sim Richard v Law Society of Singapore [2015] SGHC 302 – Rule 31 of PCR, meaning of persons involved in or associated with former clients

Singapore Law; Legal; Lawyer

Significance: principles on Rule 31 of the Legal Profession (Professional Conduct) Rules prohibiting solicitors from acting against former clients and persons “involved in or associated with” former clients in related matters; meaning of persons “involved in or associated with” former clients; “related matters”.

Continue reading “Case Update: Boey Pang Sim Richard v Law Society of Singapore [2015] SGHC 302 – Rule 31 of PCR, meaning of persons involved in or associated with former clients”

Case Update: PT Selecta Bestama v Sin Huat Huat Marine Transportation Pte Ltd [2015] SGHC 295 – stay of proceedings, multi-tiered dispute resolution clause, obligation to negotiate and exclusive jurisdiction clause

Singapore Law; Legal; Lawyer

PT Selecta Bestama v Sin Huat Huat Marine Transportation Pte Ltd [2015] SGHC 295

Significance: stay of proceedings, multi-tiered dispute resolution clause, obligation to negotiate prior to legal proceedings and exclusive jurisdiction clause; reliance on exclusive jurisdiction clause despite challenging validity of contract.

Continue reading “Case Update: PT Selecta Bestama v Sin Huat Huat Marine Transportation Pte Ltd [2015] SGHC 295 – stay of proceedings, multi-tiered dispute resolution clause, obligation to negotiate and exclusive jurisdiction clause”

Case Update: Piattchanine, Iouri v Phosagro Asia Pte Ltd [2015] SGHC 259 – new grounds for terminating employment contract post-termination; breaches of implied contractual duties of employee

Singapore Law; Legal; Lawyer

Piattchanine, Iouri v Phosagro Asia Pte Ltd [2015] SGHC 259

Significance: High Court determines issue of when it is permissible to raise new grounds for terminating employment contract post-termination; breaches of implied contractual duties of employee.

Continue reading “Case Update: Piattchanine, Iouri v Phosagro Asia Pte Ltd [2015] SGHC 259 – new grounds for terminating employment contract post-termination; breaches of implied contractual duties of employee”

Case Update: Cavendish Square Holding BV v Talal El Makdessi (Cavendish) and ParkingEye Limited v Beavis UKSC – penalty clauses

Singapore Law; Legal; Lawyer

Cavendish Square Holding BV v Talal El Makdessi (Cavendish) and ParkingEye Limited v Beavis [2015] UKSC 67

Significance: the true test for whether a clause is unenforceable as a penalty clause is whether the impugned provision is a secondary obligation which imposes a detriment on the contract-breaker out of all proportion to any legitimate interest of the innocent party in the enforcement of the primary obligation.

Continue reading “Case Update: Cavendish Square Holding BV v Talal El Makdessi (Cavendish) and ParkingEye Limited v Beavis UKSC – penalty clauses”

Unger, Phang, Politics & Prayer

“When philosophy has gained the truth of which it is capable, it passes into politics and prayer, politics through which the world is changed, prayer through which men ask God to complete the change of the world by carrying them into His presence and giving them what, left to themselves, they would always lack.”

  • Roberto Unger, Knowledge and Politics (New York: Free Press, 1975) at 294.

“And, as the reader might have discerned by now, I do believe in God and in the higher knowledge that cannot be ours. And that explains why I believe that Unger (or any other theorist) cannot postulate an even close to perfect theory. That this is so is demonstrated by the complex mesh of critique and counter-critique that have, as their central focus, the influential theory or theories of the day. Indeed, Unger himself believed that to be so in Knowledge and Politics, although his present views are rather less obvious. I see nothing terribly frightening in this acknowledgment of the fallibility of human knowledge which we nevertheless continue to use whilst functioning as human beings. It also mandates a humility which has, in any event, always been the hallmark of the great scholars of our time.”

  • Andrew Phang, “Toward Critique and Reconstruction. Roberto Unger on Law, Passion and Politics”, Hull University Law School, Studies in Law (1993) at 78